Trump's AI Plan vs. Europe's Approach: A Turning Point for AI Development?

Of 60,632 companies using AI worldwide, the United States hosts 16,327, while the European Union (EU) leads with 18,712 companies.

As the U.S. pushes for rapid development and deregulation, Europe focuses on ethical considerations and safety measures, raising questions about which strategy will prevail in the race for AI supremacy.

Since his return to office in January 2025, Trump has launched a number of quite bold initiatives. For example, Trump’s $500 billion AI Plan, which focuses on private infrastructure investment and involves major players like OpenAI, Oracle, Softbank, and investment firm, MGX, has the potential to impact the global AI landscape. This commitment was further strengthened by signing an executive order titled "Removing Barriers to American Leadership in Artificial Intelligence." Some may say the snowball effect is incoming.

Executive Order | Link

In short, Trump’s latest executive order declares that this AI plan embodies "the policy of the United States to sustain and enhance America's global AI dominance to promote human flourishing, economic competitiveness, and national security." The key initiatives focus on AI system development, with advisors required to create an AI action plan within 180 days.

However, Trump's claims of U.S. dominance in AI companies contradict current data. According to Dealroom, of 60,632 companies using AI worldwide, the United States hosts 16,327, while the European Union (EU) leads with 18,712 companies — surpassing the U.S. by 13.62%.

This situation raises two crucial questions: Can Trump's strategy successfully accelerate AI innovation while boosting national competitiveness and ensuring unbiased development? And will Europe maintain its current market leadership?

Europe’s AI Act: a risk-based framework towards AI development

The EU Artificial Intelligence Act marks a milestone in AI regulation by establishing a comprehensive European framework. Since August 1, 2024, it has categorized AI systems into four risk levels: unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal. This risk-based approach aims to protect fundamental rights, boost innovation, establish Europe as an AI leader, and ensure AI systems remain human-centric, safe, and trustworthy.

For investment and support, the EU plans to invest €1 billion annually in AI through the Horizon Europe and Digital Europe programs while mobilizing additional investments to reach €20 billion annually over the digital decade.

So, Is Trump's AI Plan a Wake-Up Call for Europe?

Let's compare key aspects of both approaches: regulatory stance, international strategy, investment plans, policy priorities, ideological focus, and implementation timeline:

Trump’s AI Plan

Trump's AI plan significantly challenges Europe's AI development and regulatory approach. His emphasis on deregulation and massive private investment could accelerate U.S. AI innovation beyond Europe's pace. The proposed $500 billion Stargate initiative dwarfs the EU's planned €20 billion annual investment, potentially creating a substantial funding gap.

A more permissive U.S. environment for AI development could attract top talent and companies away from Europe, threatening the EU's global leadership position. The "America-first" strategy may intensify global tech competition, particularly with China. Europe must reassess its position to maintain its competitive edge in this rapidly evolving landscape.

Plot Twist: DeepSeek's R1 Launch: A Third Power Enters the AI Race

The launch of DeepSeek's new AI model, R1, further impacts Trump's AI plan as well as the EU AI Act. First, the R1 model demonstrates China's ability to create AI systems that rival U.S. tech giants like OpenAI and Google at a lower cost (just $6M compared to $100M). This questions the need for massive investments such as Trump's $500 billion Stargate project.

Furthermore, DeepSeek's data practices, especially its user data storage on Chinese servers, pose major GDPR compliance issues. In particular, such an approach exposes gaps in the EU AI Act's protection of citizens' data during interactions with non-EU AI systems. Speaking specifically, the Act's risk-based approach requires updates to address better AI systems developed under different regulatory frameworks, particularly given R1's increased potential for generating harmful content compared to its Western counterparts.

Long story short – DeepSeek's achievements under an alternative regulatory system underscore the widening gap in AI governance among the U.S., EU, and China. This success through rapid, cost-effective development suggests that Trump's plan and the EU AI Act need to reassess their approaches to balancing innovation and safety. So, is this tension between the US and China ongoing, even in AI?

Wrapping Up: AI’s Global Implication and Future Outlook

DeepSeek's rise as a major AI player may heighten geopolitical tensions, leading to either stricter policies or a rethinking of how nations cooperate on AI development and regulation. The R1 model serves as a wake-up call for both U.S. and EU policymakers, showing the urgent need for more flexible, thorough, and internationally minded approaches to AI oversight and development.

Sources:

Aljazeera | Link
Amity Solutions | Link
Arnold & Portner | Link
China Briefing | Link
CNN | Link 1 | Link 2
Coface | Link
DLA PIPER | Link
DW | Link
Euro News | Link
European Commission | Link
Fedscoop | Link
Fello AI | Link
Foreign Policy | Link
Gov Tech | Link
JD Supra | Link
Ling & Spalding | Link
Mintz | Link
Newsweek | Link
RFID Journal | Link
Software Improvement Group | Link
Tech Target | Link
The Economist | Link
The Manila Times | Link
Time | Link
Vinci Works | Link
White House | Link

---

For Paid Subscribers

Beyond this point is access to exclusive and archived content, tutorials, and behind the scenes.

Upgrade to paid to build the essential skills of money and risk management for a truly self-sufficient future.

Continue to Tutorial: Placing Market, Limit, Stop Orders